A Statement from John Burwell in Response to General Convention 2006 (Restor of Holy Cross)

26 June 2006 - Print Version

Source: The Church of the Holy Cross

Dear   friends and parish family,

General   Convention 2006 is over, and I truly thank you for your constant prayer   while we delegates dealt with interminable political maneuvering and   resolutions designed to obfuscate. We went to General Convention with   one overarching plan – to force clarification upon those who wanted   none, and to lose gracefully. It would be an understatement to say that   we accomplished our goal on both accounts.

The House of Deputies and   the House of Bishops failed to affirm the Windsor Report, and the   insipid resolution that we did pass, B-033, was immediately rejected by   20 revisionist bishops who said they would not abide by it.  We also passed a resolution that opposes any state or federal constitutional   amendment that would prohibit same-sex civil marriage or civil unions,  and we passed a resolution that states that parts of Holy Scripture are Anti-Semitic.

The bishops chose the   Right Reverend Katharine Jefferts Schori to be our next Presiding   Bishop, and the House of Deputies confirmed her by an approximate 90%  margin. Ms. Schori is indisputably the least qualified Presiding Bishop   ever chosen, having never served as a rector of a church, and having   been a bishop for only five years. In addition, her theological leanings are those of radical revisionism. In her first sermon to General   Convention, Katharine Schori referred to Jesus as “our mother, who gives   birth to a new creation.” She voted for, and ardently supports Gene   Robinson, and she sees nothing but goodness in homosexuality, which she   described as just a different gifting.

The   Official Convention worship was described as often non-Trinitarian by   our Canon Theologian who attended every service. There was no confession   of sin at any Communion except the Sunday service. The sermons were for   the most part borderline heresy; being Pelagian at best, and sounding   like Marcion at worst.

What is clear is that we   have two entirely different religions now trying to exist under one   name. The Episcopal Church as revealed at General Convention 2006 no   longer even remotely resembles the Episcopal Church I once knew. As a   result, I find that I must repudiate the national leadership of the   Episcopal Church as it is presently constituted, and I repudiate the   Episcopal Church that the present national leadership would want us to   embrace.

Our Diocesan Standing   Committee will meet in a special session this Wednesday, June 28th,  and I fully expect them to respond to this Convention strongly and   decisively. I ask your prayers as we move ahead in the coming months. I   also ask you to remember that we are going to be just fine. I join with   our bishops who wrote to us and said:

“Our   future as a diocese in full Communion with the worldwide Anglican   Communion is bright, and our gospel energy in our parishes and   missions is strong. What is critical is that we seek to navigate   these turbulent waters together as a diocese, and not simply as   individuals or even individual parishes. The Lord will bring us   through this time stronger than ever before if we all begin to take   more initiative as a body.”

May our Lord Jesus Christ   give us grace as we navigate these uncharted waters, and may we rely   solely upon Him.

John Burwell

0 Responses. Comments closed for this entry.

Page 1 of 1