Anglican Communion is in crisis - Lord Carey

Carey says Anglican Communion is in crisis
Former archbishop of Canterbury wants U.S. church to give in to demands

By RICHARD VARA
Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

The former archbishop of Canterbury wants the Episcopal Church to support an international agreement calling for a moratorium in the Anglican Church on the consecration of gay bishops and church blessing of same-sex unions.

“The Anglican Communion as such is in crisis,” said the Most Rev. George Carey, who was in Houston this week to install the Rev. Russell J. Levenson Jr. as rector of St. Martin’s Episcopal Church, one of the largest Episcopal churches in the United States.

The 77 million member communion, including 2.15 Episcopalians, has been in turmoil since the 2003 consecration of an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire.

“It has created enormous tidal waves, shock waves around the world,” Carey said of the consecration of Bishop V. Gene Robinson. “It has hindered missions in Muslim countries. It has distressed conservative congregations everywhere. There is no place in the Anglican Communion that has been impervious to the shock waves.”

Scores of American parishes and at least two dioceses are asking for foreign oversight because members feel the national church is no longer traditional in biblical interpretation and practice. Asking for such oversight is contrary to Anglican governance.

“If I were in my successor’s shoes, what I would be wanting to do is say that the American House of Bishops must commit itself to the Windsor Covenant and be wholehearted about that,” Carey said of the 2004 report calling for the moratorium. “Around the Windsor Covenant we can actually find a way to deepen the dialogue and get people there.

“If we don’t insist upon that, then I think our number is up and so I worry about that,” he said.

Carey served as archbishop from 1991 to 2002. His successor as titular head of the Anglican Communion is Archbishop Rowan Williams.

Despite claims to adhering to Windsor, the American House of Bishops has said that only the denomination’s national assembly could speak to the issue. The next General Convention is scheduled for 2009.

Although the bishops have supported a ban on gay consecration and blessing of same-sex unions until then, that has not quieted the furor.

The once-a-decade meeting of the world’s Anglican bishops is set for July in Canterbury, England. Conservative leaders, including Archbishop Peter Akinola of Nigeria, are calling for an Anglican conference in June in Jerusalem, a move that some say is meant to undercut attendance the following month at the Lambeth Conference in England.

“If the Jerusalem conference is an alternative to the Lambeth Conference, which I perceive it is, then I think it is regrettable,” said Carey, a conservative. “The irony is that all they are going to do is weaken the Lambeth Conference. They are going to give the liberals a more powerful voice because they are absent and they are going to act as if they are schismatics. It’s crazy.”

Ten years ago, Carey presided over the 1998 Lambeth Conference which declared homosexual behavior as not scriptural.

“So what the American church has done by the election and then ordination of Gene Robinson is really actually turn its back on the voice, the moral voice of the Lambeth Conference. That’s the problem basically. There is no way out of the problem now.”

Still, Carey feels that if the Americans were to come out wholeheartedly for the Windsor Covenant, dialogue and reconciliation would be possible.

“If the Episcopal Church says, ‘No, dammit, we are not going to go that way’, then there is no dialogue,” he said. “They are actually saying they are walking away from the family, they are closing the door. But if they are prepared to say, ‘We will fall in behind the convenant,’ then we can find a resolution.

“But there is no sign that the American House of Bishops realizes how serious it is,” he said.

Carey said he remains active in the church although he is an ex-archbishop.

“What I am trying to do now is make a contribution towards healing the church,” he said.

He also is working as head of a British education program and for interfaith understanding. He travels regularly with his wife to Africa, where the “church is strong.”

“My problem is that I am probably doing too much,” he said. “I need to slow down a bit.”

But one thing he won’t be doing is leaving the Anglican Communion.

“Basically the Anglican spirit aches for unity and I don’t think there are going to be many people who are going to be in a rush to run away from the See of Canterbury.”

    Comments & Responses

  1. The present climate of change within the Church - not only the Anglicans but all Churches - arises, I believe, from a lack of the Christian charity which Christ urged upon his followers.

    As in his own day, Christ was rejected by the Temple authorities for his seeming disrespect for the accretions of the Law; so Christ is now being rejected in parts of the Church, by those who seem to want to return to the culture of Law, when grace and faith comes only through Jesus Christ.

    As Saint Paul tells us, the Law never saved anyone. No-one was ever saved by adherence to the Law. See the story of the Rich Young Man, who came to Jesus stating that he had kept the Law and the Prophets. However, this did not entitle him to join the disciples of Jesus. First, he had to subscribe to Jesus’ new Law of Love, which required him to give away his property, in order to seek the Kingdom of God.

    Jesus’ words on that occasion need to be noted:
    “If you would be PERFECT, go and..............”
    Our only hope of salvation is in Jesus Christ himself, and the living out of the Gospel, which is ‘Good News’ and not bad. No, this is not what some might call ‘cheap grace’ because it cost God the life of his Only-Begotten Son, Jesus. and if we are to become disciples of Christ, then we must ‘take up our cross and follow him’. It seems, on reflection, that Jesus was counselling the young man to abandon his own ideas of what self-perfection might mean. To ‘lust after’ perfection may just be another way of seeking our own means of redemption - without Christ.

    Sometimes ‘our cross’ might be in the form of our own indisposition (gayness?), sickness - not everyone who is prayed for is healed - or a seemingly sinful Church. Whatever cross we are saddled with (Paul’s thorn in the flesh!), we may be called to bear it with the grace that only God can give. Paul had to learn to depend on God’s acceptance of his disability! His imperfection!

    At the end of his tether with his own sense of sin, Paul asked the question “Why do I do what I know I ought not to do; and why do I not do what I ought to do? It seems then that he paused to think, realising that there was no satisfactory answer to this conundrum. He then said “But thanks be to God for the victory - in our Lord Jesus Christ” Not, you’ll notice, ‘in the Law and the Prophets’; nor in the latest version of the Scriptures, but: In our Lord Jesus Christ! - our ‘means of grace and the hope of glory’.

    Thanks be to God for his unspeakable gift! 

    This seems diametrically opposite, to me, to the puritanical theology of clean up or check out, which is not the Gospel (Good News) of Jesus, who spent his time caring for the outcast and sinner.
    The refusal of some of the Primates to share at the Table of Christ with those they perceived as somehow defective in their theology (technically unclean) in convocations of our Church can never be excused on the false premise of ‘orthodoxy’.

    Lord Carey, sadly, is now interfering with the primacy of his successor in suggesting that Rowan Archbishop of Canterbury should follow any other course than he is presently doing. With Carey, Archbsihop Rowan is trying to foster the unity of the Church in a culture of rampant divisiveness, which, being against the Prayer of Christ, will not prevail.

    Posted by  on  01/20  at  12:39 PM
  2. Page 1 of 1 pages
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

<< Back to main